token.app › Compare › Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen3.8 Omni FlashDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.150$0.150
Output $/1M$0.470$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.230$0.262
Context window1M1.0M
Max output131K393K
ReleasedSep 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Qwen3.8 Omni Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.230 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen3.8 Omni Flash cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is cheaper: $0.230 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.470 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen3.8 Omni Flash and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Qwen3.8 Omni Flash full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Flint (free) Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Glimpse Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Qwen3.8 Omni Flash vs Mercury 3