token.app › Compare › Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $1.00 per million tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch)Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)
ProviderAnthropicInclusionai
Input $/1M$0.500Free
Output $/1M$2.50Free
Blended $/1M$1.00Free
Context window200K262K
Max output64K33K
ReleasedOct 2025Aug 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $1.00 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $1.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs Free. Output alone: $2.50 vs Free.
What context windows do Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch): 200,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) is made by Anthropic. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.
Related comparisons
Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) full details Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) full details Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Muse Spark 1.2 Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.8 Max Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Inkling Small Claude Haiku 4.5 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash