token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 vs Muse Spark 1.2
Codestral 2508 vs Muse Spark 1.2
Codestral 2508 is 4.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Codestral 2508 | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $0.900 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.450 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.0M |
| Max output | — | — |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Codestral 2508 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.450 vs $2.00 blended
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Codestral 2508 is cheaper: $0.450 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.900 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 and Muse Spark 1.2?
Codestral 2508 is made by Mistral AI. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.