token.app › Compare › Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Codestral 2508 vs Qwen3.8 Max
Codestral 2508 is 6.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Codestral 2508 | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.300 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $0.900 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.450 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Codestral 2508 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.450 vs $3.00 blended
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Codestral 2508 or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Codestral 2508 and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Codestral 2508 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Codestral 2508 is cheaper: $0.450 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.300 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.900 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Codestral 2508 and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Codestral 2508: 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Codestral 2508 and Qwen3.8 Max?
Codestral 2508 is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.