token.app › Compare › Command A vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Command A vs GPT-5.6 Luna
GPT-5.6 Luna is 19× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Command A | GPT-5.6 Luna | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | OpenAI |
| Input $/1M | $2.50 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $4.38 | $0.225 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.1M |
| Max output | 8K | 128K |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Command A if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna if…
- Costs less per token — $0.225 vs $4.38 blended
- Larger context window (1.1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command A or GPT-5.6 Luna?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command A and GPT-5.6 Luna, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command A cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
GPT-5.6 Luna is cheaper: $0.225 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $0.100. Output alone: $10.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Command A and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Command A and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Command A is made by Cohere. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.