token.app › Compare › Command A vs Muse Spark 1.2
Command A vs Muse Spark 1.2
Muse Spark 1.2 is 2.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Command A | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Meta |
| Input $/1M | $2.50 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $4.38 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 256K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Command A if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Costs less per token — $2.00 vs $4.38 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command A and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command A cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $2.00 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $1.25. Output alone: $10.00 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Command A and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Command A and Muse Spark 1.2?
Command A is made by Cohere. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.