token.app › Compare › Command A vs Qwen3.8 Max
Command A vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Command A | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $2.50 | $2.00 |
| Output $/1M | $10.00 | $6.00 |
| Blended $/1M | $4.38 | $3.00 |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 8K | 131K |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Command A if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
- Costs less per token — $3.00 vs $4.38 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Command A or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Command A and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Command A cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper: $3.00 versus $4.38 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $2.50 vs $2.00. Output alone: $10.00 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Command A and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Command A: 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Command A and Qwen3.8 Max?
Command A is made by Cohere. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.