token.app › Compare › R1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max

R1 0528 vs Qwen3.8 Max

R1 0528 is 3.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
R1 0528Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.500$2.00
Output $/1M$2.15$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.912$3.00
Context window164K1M
Max output33K131K
ReleasedMay 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose R1 0528 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.912 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, R1 0528 or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is R1 0528 cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
R1 0528 is cheaper: $0.912 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.500 vs $2.00. Output alone: $2.15 vs $6.00.
What context windows do R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max have?
R1 0528: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes R1 0528 and Qwen3.8 Max?
R1 0528 is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons