token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.8 Max

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.8 Max

DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is 6.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
DeepSeek V3.1 TerminusQwen3.8 Max
ProviderDeepSeekAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.270$2.00
Output $/1M$1.00$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.453$3.00
Context window164K1M
Max output33K131K
ReleasedSep 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.453 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is cheaper: $0.453 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.270 vs $2.00. Output alone: $1.00 vs $6.00.
What context windows do DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max have?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus: 163,840 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus and Qwen3.8 Max?
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus is made by DeepSeek. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus full details Qwen3.8 Max full details DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Muse Spark 1.2 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Inkling Small DeepSeek V3.1 Terminus vs Qwen3.7 Flash