token.app › Compare › DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Inkling

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Inkling

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 6.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Inkling
ProviderDeepSeekThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.150$1.00
Output $/1M$0.600$4.05
Blended $/1M$0.262$1.76
Context window1.0M524K
Max output393K472K
ReleasedOct 2026Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $1.76 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose Inkling if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
FAQ
Which is better, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Inkling?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 cheaper than Inkling?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $1.76 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.150 vs $1.00. Output alone: $0.600 vs $4.05.
What context windows do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling have?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Inkling: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 and Inkling?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek. Inkling is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Inkling full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Flint (free) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Glimpse DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Mercury 3