token.app › Compare › Nano Banana 2.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 6.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Nano Banana 2.1Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderGoogleReflection
Input $/1M$1.50$0.250
Output $/1M$7.50$1.00
Blended $/1M$3.00$0.438
Context window66K1.0M
Max output59K131K
ReleasedOct 2026Oct 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Nano Banana 2.1 if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $3.00 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nano Banana 2.1 or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nano Banana 2.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nano Banana 2.1 cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.250. Output alone: $7.50 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Nano Banana 2.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nano Banana 2.1 and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Nano Banana 2.1 is made by Google. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons