token.app › Compare › Nano Banana 2.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Nano Banana 2.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Nano Banana 2.1 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Input $/1M | $1.50 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $7.50 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 66K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 59K | 393K |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Open weights |
Choose Nano Banana 2.1 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $3.00 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Open weights — self-hostable
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nano Banana 2.1 or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nano Banana 2.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nano Banana 2.1 cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.150. Output alone: $7.50 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Nano Banana 2.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Nano Banana 2.1 and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Nano Banana 2.1 is made by Google. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.