token.app › Compare › Nano Banana 2.1 vs Mercury 3
Nano Banana 2.1 vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 is 18× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Nano Banana 2.1 | Mercury 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | |
| Input $/1M | $1.50 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $7.50 | $0.350 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $0.163 |
| Context window | 66K | 1M |
| Max output | 59K | 131K |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Nano Banana 2.1 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Mercury 3 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $3.00 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Nano Banana 2.1 or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nano Banana 2.1 and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nano Banana 2.1 cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.100. Output alone: $7.50 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Nano Banana 2.1 and Mercury 3 have?
Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nano Banana 2.1 and Mercury 3?
Nano Banana 2.1 is made by Google. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.