token.app › Compare › Nano Banana 2.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Nano Banana 2.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 55× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Nano Banana 2.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $1.50 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $7.50 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $3.00 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 66K | 1M |
| Max output | 59K | 66K |
| Released | Oct 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Choose Nano Banana 2.1 if…
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $3.00 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
FAQ
Which is better, Nano Banana 2.1 or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Nano Banana 2.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Nano Banana 2.1 cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $1.50 vs $0.030. Output alone: $7.50 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Nano Banana 2.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Nano Banana 2.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Nano Banana 2.1 is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons