token.app › Compare › Gemma 2 27B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Gemma 2 27B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 1.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemma 2 27BBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderGoogleReflection
Input $/1M$0.650$0.250
Output $/1M$0.650$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.650$0.438
Context window8K1.0M
Max output2K131K
ReleasedJul 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Gemma 2 27B if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $0.650 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 2 27B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 2 27B cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $0.650 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.650 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.650 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Gemma 2 27B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Gemma 2 27B is made by Google. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons