token.app › Compare › Gemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Gemma 2 27B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 2 27B | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | |
| Input $/1M | $0.650 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.650 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.650 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 8K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 2K | 393K |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Gemma 2 27B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.650 blended
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 2 27B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 2 27B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.650 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.650 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.650 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Gemma 2 27B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 2 27B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Gemma 2 27B is made by Google. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.