token.app › Compare › Gemma 2 27B vs Mercury 3
Gemma 2 27B vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 is 4.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 2 27B | Mercury 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | |
| Input $/1M | $0.650 | $0.100 |
| Output $/1M | $0.650 | $0.350 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.650 | $0.163 |
| Context window | 8K | 1M |
| Max output | 2K | 131K |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Gemma 2 27B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.163 vs $0.650 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 2 27B and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 2 27B cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mercury 3 is cheaper: $0.163 versus $0.650 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.650 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.650 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Gemma 2 27B and Mercury 3 have?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Mercury 3?
Gemma 2 27B is made by Google. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.