token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ Gemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.5

Gemma 2 27B vs Grok 4.5

Grok 4.5 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Gemma 2 27B is 4.6ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.5 accepts the larger context window (500K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemma 2 27BGrok 4.5
ProviderGooglexAI
Input $/1M$0.650$2.00
Output $/1M$0.650$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.650$3.00
Context window8K500K
Max output2Kโ€”
ReleasedJul 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
GPQA Diamond 36.5% 93.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 1.4% 97.8%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Gemma 2 27B ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.650 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights โ€” self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.5 ifโ€ฆ
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (93.4% vs 36.5%)
  • Higher OTIS Mock AIME (97.8% vs 1.4%)
  • Larger context window (500K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Grok 4.5?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Gemma 2 27B leads on 0 and Grok 4.5 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is Gemma 2 27B cheaper than Grok 4.5?
Gemma 2 27B is cheaper: $0.650 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.650 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.650 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.5 have?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Grok 4.5: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Grok 4.5?
Gemma 2 27B is made by Google. Grok 4.5 is made by xAI.
Related comparisons