token.app › Compare › Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Small 3
Gemma 2 27B vs Mistral Small 3
Mistral Small 3 leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Mistral Small 3 is 11× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mistral Small 3 accepts the larger context window (33K).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 2 27B | Mistral Small 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Input $/1M | $0.650 | $0.050 |
| Output $/1M | $0.650 | $0.080 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.650 | $0.058 |
| Context window | 8K | 33K |
| Max output | 2K | 16K |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Jan 2025 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
| GPQA Diamond | 36.5% | 45.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 1.4% | 5.3% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Gemma 2 27B if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Mistral Small 3 if…
- Costs less per token — $0.058 vs $0.650 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (45.3% vs 36.5%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (5.3% vs 1.4%)
- Larger context window (33K)
- Newer model (released Jan 2025)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 2 27B or Mistral Small 3?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Gemma 2 27B leads on 0 and Mistral Small 3 leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Gemma 2 27B cheaper than Mistral Small 3?
Mistral Small 3 is cheaper: $0.058 versus $0.650 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.650 vs $0.050. Output alone: $0.650 vs $0.080.
What context windows do Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Small 3 have?
Gemma 2 27B: 8,192 tokens. Mistral Small 3: 32,768 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 2 27B and Mistral Small 3?
Gemma 2 27B is made by Google. Mistral Small 3 is made by Mistral AI.