token.app › Compare › Gemma 3n 4B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Gemma 3n 4B vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $0.075 per million tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemma 3n 4BLing 3.0 Tiny (free)
ProviderGoogleInclusionai
Input $/1M$0.060Free
Output $/1M$0.120Free
Blended $/1M$0.075Free
Context window33K262K
Max output33K
ReleasedMay 2025Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Gemma 3n 4B if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $0.075 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 3n 4B or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 3n 4B and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 3n 4B cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.075 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.060 vs Free. Output alone: $0.120 vs Free.
What context windows do Gemma 3n 4B and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
Gemma 3n 4B: 32,768 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 3n 4B and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Gemma 3n 4B is made by Google. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.
Related comparisons