token.app › Compare › Gemma 3n 4B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemma 3n 4B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 1.4× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 3n 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.060 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.120 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.075 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 33K | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Released | May 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Gemma 3n 4B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.075 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 3n 4B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 3n 4B and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 3n 4B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.075 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.060 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.120 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemma 3n 4B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemma 3n 4B: 32,768 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 3n 4B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemma 3n 4B is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.