token.app › Compare › Gemma 3n 4B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Gemma 3n 4B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Gemma 3n 4B is 27× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 3n 4B | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Input $/1M | $0.060 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $0.120 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.075 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 33K | 1.0M |
| Max output | — | — |
| Released | May 2025 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Gemma 3n 4B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.075 vs $2.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 3n 4B or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 3n 4B and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 3n 4B cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Gemma 3n 4B is cheaper: $0.075 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.060 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.120 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Gemma 3n 4B and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Gemma 3n 4B: 32,768 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 3n 4B and Muse Spark 1.2?
Gemma 3n 4B is made by Google. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.