token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Gemma 4 26B A4B is 3.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemma 4 26B A4B Beam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderGoogleReflection
Input $/1M$0.090$0.250
Output $/1M$0.300$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.143$0.438
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K131K
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.143 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 4 26B A4B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper: $0.143 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.090 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.300 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Gemma 4 26B A4B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Gemma 4 26B A4B : 262,144 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by Google. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons