token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 26B A4B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Gemma 4 26B A4B is 1.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemma 4 26B A4B DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderGoogleDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.090$0.150
Output $/1M$0.300$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.143$0.262
Context window262K1.0M
Max output236K393K
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.143 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 4 26B A4B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper: $0.143 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.090 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.300 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Gemma 4 26B A4B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Gemma 4 26B A4B : 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by Google. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons