token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mercury 3

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mercury 3

Gemma 4 26B A4B is 1.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemma 4 26B A4B Mercury 3
ProviderGoogleInception
Input $/1M$0.090$0.100
Output $/1M$0.300$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.143$0.163
Context window262K1M
Max output236K131K
ReleasedApr 2026Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.143 vs $0.163 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B cheaper than Mercury 3?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper: $0.143 versus $0.163 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.090 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.300 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mercury 3 have?
Gemma 4 26B A4B : 262,144 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and Mercury 3?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by Google. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons