token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Muse Spark 1.2
Gemma 4 26B A4B is 15× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | Muse Spark 1.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Input $/1M | $0.070 | $1.25 |
| Output $/1M | $0.340 | $4.25 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.138 | $2.00 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Aug 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
- Costs less per token — $0.138 vs $2.00 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper: $0.138 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.070 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.340 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Gemma 4 26B A4B : 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark 1.2?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by Google. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.