token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.8 Max

Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.8 Max

Gemma 4 26B A4B is 22× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.8 Max accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemma 4 26B A4B Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderGoogleAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.070$2.00
Output $/1M$0.340$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.138$3.00
Context window262K1M
Max output16K131K
ReleasedApr 2026Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.138 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.8 Max if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3.8 Max?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.8 Max, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper: $0.138 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.070 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.340 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.8 Max have?
Gemma 4 26B A4B : 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.8 Max?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by Google. Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons