token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Gemma 4 26B A4B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba | |
| Input $/1M | $0.070 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.340 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.138 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.138 blended
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.138 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.070 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.340 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Gemma 4 26B A4B : 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 26B A4B and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemma 4 26B A4B is made by Google. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.