token.app › Compare › Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Spark 1.2

Gemma 4 31B vs Muse Spark 1.2

Gemma 4 31B is 12× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Muse Spark 1.2 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Gemma 4 31BMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderGoogleMeta
Input $/1M$0.100$1.25
Output $/1M$0.340$4.25
Blended $/1M$0.160$2.00
Context window262K1.0M
Max output262K
ReleasedApr 2026Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Gemma 4 31B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.160 vs $2.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Muse Spark 1.2 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Muse Spark 1.2?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark 1.2, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Gemma 4 31B cheaper than Muse Spark 1.2?
Gemma 4 31B is cheaper: $0.160 versus $2.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.100 vs $1.25. Output alone: $0.340 vs $4.25.
What context windows do Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark 1.2 have?
Gemma 4 31B: 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.2: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Gemma 4 31B and Muse Spark 1.2?
Gemma 4 31B is made by Google. Muse Spark 1.2 is made by Meta.
Related comparisons