token.app › Compare › Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 6.2× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.2 1B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderMetaReflection
Input $/1M$0.027$0.250
Output $/1M$0.201$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.071$0.438
Context window60K1.0M
Max output54K131K
ReleasedSep 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Llama 3.2 1B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.071 vs $0.438 blended
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 versus $0.438 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.027 vs $0.250. Output alone: $0.201 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is made by Meta. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Flint (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Glimpse Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Mercury 3