token.app › Compare › Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Mercury 3

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Mercury 3

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 2.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.2 1B InstructMercury 3
ProviderMetaInception
Input $/1M$0.027$0.100
Output $/1M$0.201$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.071$0.163
Context window60K1M
Max output54K131K
ReleasedSep 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Llama 3.2 1B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.071 vs $0.163 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct cheaper than Mercury 3?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 versus $0.163 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.027 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.201 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Mercury 3 have?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Mercury 3?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is made by Meta. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct full details Mercury 3 full details Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Flint (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Glimpse Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B