token.app › Compare › Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 3.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.2 1B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderMetaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.027$0.150
Output $/1M$0.201$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.071$0.262
Context window60K1.0M
Max output54K393K
ReleasedSep 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Llama 3.2 1B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.071 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.027 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.201 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is made by Meta. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Flint (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Glimpse Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Mercury 3