token.app › Compare › Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 12× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.2 1B InstructGemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderMetaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.027$0.300
Output $/1M$0.201$2.50
Blended $/1M$0.071$0.850
Context window60K1.0M
Max output54K66K
ReleasedSep 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Llama 3.2 1B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.071 vs $0.850 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.027 vs $0.300. Output alone: $0.201 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is made by Meta. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Flint (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Glimpse Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B