token.app › Compare › Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 43× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.6 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.2 1B InstructGemini 3.6 Flash
ProviderMetaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.027$1.50
Output $/1M$0.201$7.50
Blended $/1M$0.071$3.00
Context window60K1.0M
Max output60K66K
ReleasedSep 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Llama 3.2 1B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.071 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.6 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Gemini 3.6 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.027 vs $1.50. Output alone: $0.201 vs $7.50.
What context windows do Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash have?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens. Gemini 3.6 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Gemini 3.6 Flash?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is made by Meta. Gemini 3.6 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct full details Gemini 3.6 Flash full details Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Muse Spark 1.2 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Latest Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Inkling Small