token.app › Compare › Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 21× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.2 1B InstructGemini 3.7 Flash
ProviderMetaGoogle
Input $/1M$0.027$0.750
Output $/1M$0.201$3.75
Blended $/1M$0.071$1.50
Context window60K1.0M
Max output54K66K
ReleasedSep 2024Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Llama 3.2 1B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.071 vs $1.50 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Gemini 3.7 Flash if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Gemini 3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Gemini 3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct cheaper than Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 versus $1.50 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.027 vs $0.750. Output alone: $0.201 vs $3.75.
What context windows do Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Gemini 3.7 Flash have?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Gemini 3.7 Flash?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is made by Meta. Gemini 3.7 Flash is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct full details Gemini 3.7 Flash full details Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Flint (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Glimpse Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B