token.app › Compare › Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Grok 4.6

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Grok 4.6

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 43× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Grok 4.6 accepts the larger context window (500K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Llama 3.2 1B InstructGrok 4.6
ProviderMetaSpaceXAI
Input $/1M$0.027$2.00
Output $/1M$0.201$6.00
Blended $/1M$0.071$3.00
Context window60K500K
Max output54K450K
ReleasedSep 2024Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Llama 3.2 1B Instruct if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.071 vs $3.00 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Grok 4.6 if…
  • Larger context window (500K)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or Grok 4.6?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Grok 4.6, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Llama 3.2 1B Instruct cheaper than Grok 4.6?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is cheaper: $0.071 versus $3.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.027 vs $2.00. Output alone: $0.201 vs $6.00.
What context windows do Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Grok 4.6 have?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens. Grok 4.6: 500,000 tokens.
Who makes Llama 3.2 1B Instruct and Grok 4.6?
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is made by Meta. Grok 4.6 is made by SpaceXAI.
Related comparisons
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct full details Grok 4.6 full details Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Flint (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Glimpse Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B