token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3 vs Qwen3.5-Flash
Mistral Medium 3 vs Qwen3.5-Flash
Qwen3.5-Flash leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks. Qwen3.5-Flash is 7.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.5-Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Mistral Medium 3 | Qwen3.5-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.400 | $0.065 |
| Output $/1M | $2.00 | $0.260 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.800 | $0.114 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 105K | 66K |
| Released | May 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| Licence | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 59.5% | 82.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME | 32.2% | 84.4% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Mistral Medium 3 if…
- No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.5-Flash if…
- Costs less per token — $0.114 vs $0.800 blended
- Higher GPQA Diamond (82.3% vs 59.5%)
- Higher OTIS Mock AIME (84.4% vs 32.2%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Feb 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3 or Qwen3.5-Flash?
Across the 2 benchmarks both models have independently-run scores for, Mistral Medium 3 leads on 0 and Qwen3.5-Flash leads on 2. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Mistral Medium 3 cheaper than Qwen3.5-Flash?
Qwen3.5-Flash is cheaper: $0.114 versus $0.800 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.400 vs $0.065. Output alone: $2.00 vs $0.260.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3 and Qwen3.5-Flash have?
Mistral Medium 3: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.5-Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3 and Qwen3.5-Flash?
Mistral Medium 3 is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.5-Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons