token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731

Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is 1.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch)DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
ProviderMistral AIDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.200$0.440
Output $/1M$1.00$1.32
Blended $/1M$0.400$0.660
Context window131K1.0M
Max output105K131K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryOpen weights
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.400 vs $0.660 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Open weights — self-hostable
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) or DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) cheaper than DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is cheaper: $0.400 versus $0.660 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.440. Output alone: $1.00 vs $1.32.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 have?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch): 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons