token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is 2.1× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch)Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite
ProviderMistral AIGoogle
Input $/1M$0.200$0.300
Output $/1M$1.00$2.50
Blended $/1M$0.400$0.850
Context window131K1.0M
Max output105K66K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.400 vs $0.850 blended
Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite if…
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is cheaper: $0.400 versus $0.850 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.300. Output alone: $1.00 vs $2.50.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite have?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch): 131,072 tokens. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is made by Google.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) full details Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite full details Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Flint (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Glimpse Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B