token.app › Compare › Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is 7.3× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba
Input $/1M$0.200$0.030
Output $/1M$1.00$0.130
Blended $/1M$0.400$0.055
Context window131K1M
Max output105K66K
ReleasedAug 2025Jul 2026
LicenceProprietaryProprietary
Choose Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.055 vs $0.400 blended
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.055 versus $0.400 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.200 vs $0.030. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch): 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.
Related comparisons
Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) full details Qwen3.7 Flash full details Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Flint (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Glimpse Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B