token.app › Compare › Mistral Nemo vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mistral Nemo vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
Mistral Nemo is 9.0× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Mistral Nemo | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | DeepSeek |
| Input $/1M | $0.029 | $0.150 |
| Output $/1M | $0.030 | $0.600 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.029 | $0.262 |
| Context window | 131K | 1.0M |
| Max output | 16K | 393K |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Oct 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Open weights |
Choose Mistral Nemo if…
- Costs less per token — $0.029 vs $0.262 blended
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
- Larger context window (1.0M)
- Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Nemo or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Nemo and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Nemo cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper: $0.029 versus $0.262 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.029 vs $0.150. Output alone: $0.030 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Mistral Nemo and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Nemo and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.