token.app › Compare › Mistral Nemo vs Flint (free)

Mistral Nemo vs Flint (free)

Flint (free) is free to use, against $0.029 per million tokens. Flint (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral NemoFlint (free)
ProviderMistral AIRecursive
Input $/1M$0.029Free
Output $/1M$0.030Free
Blended $/1M$0.029Free
Context window131K262K
Max output16K236K
ReleasedJul 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Mistral Nemo if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Flint (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $0.029 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Flint (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Nemo and Flint (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Nemo cheaper than Flint (free)?
Flint (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.029 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.029 vs Free. Output alone: $0.030 vs Free.
What context windows do Mistral Nemo and Flint (free) have?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. Flint (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Nemo and Flint (free)?
Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI. Flint (free) is made by Recursive.
Related comparisons