token.app › Compare › Mistral Nemo vs Mercury 3

Mistral Nemo vs Mercury 3

Mistral Nemo is 5.6× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Mercury 3 accepts the larger context window (1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral NemoMercury 3
ProviderMistral AIInception
Input $/1M$0.029$0.100
Output $/1M$0.030$0.350
Blended $/1M$0.029$0.163
Context window131K1M
Max output16K131K
ReleasedJul 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Mistral Nemo if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.029 vs $0.163 blended
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Mercury 3 if…
  • Larger context window (1M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Mercury 3?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Nemo and Mercury 3, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Nemo cheaper than Mercury 3?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper: $0.029 versus $0.163 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.029 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.030 vs $0.350.
What context windows do Mistral Nemo and Mercury 3 have?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. Mercury 3: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Nemo and Mercury 3?
Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI. Mercury 3 is made by Inception.
Related comparisons