token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ Mistral Nemo vs GPT-5.6 Luna

Mistral Nemo vs GPT-5.6 Luna

GPT-5.6 Luna leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks. Mistral Nemo is 10ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. GPT-5.6 Luna accepts the larger context window (1.1M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral NemoGPT-5.6 Luna
ProviderMistral AIOpenAI
Input $/1M$0.019$0.100
Output $/1M$0.030$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.022$0.225
Context window131K1.1M
Max output16K128K
ReleasedJul 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
GPQA Diamond 29.9% 91.6%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Mistral Nemo ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.022 vs $0.225 blended
  • Open weights โ€” self-hostable
Choose GPT-5.6 Luna ifโ€ฆ
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (91.6% vs 29.9%)
  • Larger context window (1.1M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Nemo or GPT-5.6 Luna?
Across the 1 benchmark both models have independently-run scores for, Mistral Nemo leads on 0 and GPT-5.6 Luna leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is Mistral Nemo cheaper than GPT-5.6 Luna?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper: $0.022 versus $0.225 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.019 vs $0.100. Output alone: $0.030 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Mistral Nemo and GPT-5.6 Luna have?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. GPT-5.6 Luna: 1,050,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Nemo and GPT-5.6 Luna?
Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI. GPT-5.6 Luna is made by OpenAI.
Related comparisons