token.app › Compare › Mistral Nemo vs Inkling Small

Mistral Nemo vs Inkling Small

Inkling Small leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks. Mistral Nemo is 22× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Inkling Small accepts the larger context window (524K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral NemoInkling Small
ProviderMistral AIThinkingmachines
Input $/1M$0.029$0.450
Output $/1M$0.030$1.20
Blended $/1M$0.029$0.637
Context window131K524K
Max output16K262K
ReleasedJul 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 29.9% 88.5%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Mistral Nemo if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.029 vs $0.637 blended
Choose Inkling Small if…
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (88.5% vs 29.9%)
  • Larger context window (524K)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Inkling Small?
Across the 1 benchmark both models have independently-run scores for, Mistral Nemo leads on 0 and Inkling Small leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Mistral Nemo cheaper than Inkling Small?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper: $0.029 versus $0.637 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.029 vs $0.450. Output alone: $0.030 vs $1.20.
What context windows do Mistral Nemo and Inkling Small have?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. Inkling Small: 524,288 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Nemo and Inkling Small?
Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI. Inkling Small is made by Thinkingmachines.
Related comparisons