token.app › Compare › Mistral Nemo vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Mistral Nemo vs Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is free to use, against $0.022 per million tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) accepts the larger context window (262K).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral NemoLing 3.0 Tiny (free)
ProviderMistral AIInclusionai
Input $/1M$0.019Free
Output $/1M$0.030Free
Blended $/1M$0.022Free
Context window131K262K
Max output16K33K
ReleasedJul 2024Aug 2026
LicenceOpen weightsProprietary
Choose Mistral Nemo if…
  • Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) if…
  • Costs less per token — Free vs $0.022 blended
  • Larger context window (262K)
  • Newer model (released Aug 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Nemo and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free), so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Nemo cheaper than Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is cheaper: Free versus $0.022 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.019 vs Free. Output alone: $0.030 vs Free.
What context windows do Mistral Nemo and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) have?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): 262,144 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Nemo and Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?
Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI. Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) is made by Inclusionai.
Related comparisons