token.app โ€บ Compare โ€บ Mistral Nemo vs Kimi K3

Mistral Nemo vs Kimi K3

Kimi K3 leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks. Mistral Nemo is 276ร— cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Kimi K3 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Mistral NemoKimi K3
ProviderMistral AIMoonshot AI
Input $/1M$0.019$3.00
Output $/1M$0.030$15.00
Blended $/1M$0.022$6.00
Context window131K1.0M
Max output16Kโ€”
ReleasedJul 2024Jul 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
GPQA Diamond 29.9% 93.1%
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Mistral Nemo ifโ€ฆ
  • Costs less per token โ€” $0.022 vs $6.00 blended
Choose Kimi K3 ifโ€ฆ
  • Higher GPQA Diamond (93.1% vs 29.9%)
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Kimi K3?
Across the 1 benchmark both models have independently-run scores for, Mistral Nemo leads on 0 and Kimi K3 leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input โ€” price and context window are on this page too.
Is Mistral Nemo cheaper than Kimi K3?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper: $0.022 versus $6.00 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.019 vs $3.00. Output alone: $0.030 vs $15.00.
What context windows do Mistral Nemo and Kimi K3 have?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. Kimi K3: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Nemo and Kimi K3?
Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI. Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI.
Related comparisons