token.app › Compare › Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Mistral Nemo is 2.5× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.019 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.030 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.022 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
Choose Mistral Nemo if…
- Costs less per token — $0.022 vs $0.055 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3.7 Flash?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.7 Flash, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Mistral Nemo cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper: $0.022 versus $0.055 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.019 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.030 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.