token.app › Compare › Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Mistral Nemo vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks. Mistral Nemo is 1.9× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Qwen3.7 Flash accepts the larger context window (1M).
Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
| Mistral Nemo | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Alibaba |
| Input $/1M | $0.029 | $0.030 |
| Output $/1M | $0.030 | $0.130 |
| Blended $/1M | $0.029 | $0.055 |
| Context window | 131K | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | 66K |
| Released | Jul 2024 | Jul 2026 |
| Licence | Open weights | Proprietary |
| GPQA Diamond | 29.9% | 82.3% |
Benchmark scores independently run and published by Epoch AI, 'AI Benchmarking Hub', used under CC BY 4.0. Only benchmarks with a score for BOTH models are compared.
Choose Mistral Nemo if…
- Costs less per token — $0.029 vs $0.055 blended
- Open weights — self-hostable
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- Higher GPQA Diamond (82.3% vs 29.9%)
- Larger context window (1M)
- Newer model (released Jul 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Mistral Nemo or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Across the 1 benchmark both models have independently-run scores for, Mistral Nemo leads on 0 and Qwen3.7 Flash leads on 1. Benchmarks are one input — price and context window are on this page too.
Is Mistral Nemo cheaper than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Mistral Nemo is cheaper: $0.029 versus $0.055 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.029 vs $0.030. Output alone: $0.030 vs $0.130.
What context windows do Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.7 Flash have?
Mistral Nemo: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.7 Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.
Who makes Mistral Nemo and Qwen3.7 Flash?
Mistral Nemo is made by Mistral AI. Qwen3.7 Flash is made by Alibaba.