token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 1.7× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. Beam 1.0 501B A23B accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructBeam 1.0 501B A23B
ProviderAlibabaReflection
Input $/1M$0.660$0.250
Output $/1M$1.00$1.00
Blended $/1M$0.745$0.438
Context window33K1.0M
Max output29K131K
ReleasedNov 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose Beam 1.0 501B A23B if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.438 vs $0.745 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Beam 1.0 501B A23B, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Beam 1.0 501B A23B is cheaper: $0.438 versus $0.745 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $0.250. Output alone: $1.00 vs $1.00.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Beam 1.0 501B A23B have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is made by Reflection.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details Beam 1.0 501B A23B full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Flint (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Mercury 3