token.app › Compare › Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is 2.8× cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 basis. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 accepts the larger context window (1.0M).

Head to head
Blended price uses a 3:1 input:output mix
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017
ProviderAlibabaDeepSeek
Input $/1M$0.660$0.150
Output $/1M$1.00$0.600
Blended $/1M$0.745$0.262
Context window33K1.0M
Max output29K393K
ReleasedNov 2024Oct 2026
LicenceOpen weightsOpen weights
Choose Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct if…
  • No clear advantage on the data we hold.
Choose DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 if…
  • Costs less per token — $0.262 vs $0.745 blended
  • Larger context window (1.0M)
  • Newer model (released Oct 2026)
FAQ
Which is better, Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct or DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
We do not hold independently-run benchmark scores covering both Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017, so we make no quality claim. Their pricing and specifications are compared on this page.
Is Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is cheaper: $0.262 versus $0.745 per million tokens blended at 3:1 input:output. Input alone: $0.660 vs $0.150. Output alone: $1.00 vs $0.600.
What context windows do Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 have?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct: 32,768 tokens. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens.
Who makes Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017?
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 is made by DeepSeek.
Related comparisons
Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct full details DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 full details Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Flint (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Glimpse Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B Qwen2.5 Coder 32B Instruct vs Mercury 3